Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Social Justice’

Photo by Seth Doyle on Unsplash

Do you think that I have come to establish peace on the earth? No, I tell you, but rather division.

Luke 12:51

Jesus follows this question and answer by giving various ways his message is going to divide the very units of society I’d like most to see unified — families. What verse 51 says is difficult enough to hear, but then, with the part about relatives, Jesus says to me, “There is no part of your life I won’t unsettle if you follow me.”

Because I’m someone prone to anxiety, and because I’m someone who depends on others to do for me what others do for themselves, the declarations of Luke 12:49-53 are the epitome of what I don’t want to hear. My first instinct is not to alienate anyone.

I hate controversy. I hate conflict. As someone whose “normal” has always looked and felt different than the “normal” of those around me, I just want to belong and be accepted. As someone whose brain sends garbled signals to my body, with the result being that all my muscles try to work at once, I want to be still and to relax. I want to sit on the outside of the of the events of life that range from the inconvenient to the tragic, infuriating, and horrific.

I know that my mental and physical conditions actually don’t make me different from other people in my desire not to make myself or others uncomfortable. My conditions just make this desire all the more intense — too often paralyzing. Still, I don’t think I’m alone when I acknowledge that there have been plenty of times when I wish I hadn’t been afraid to speak up. There have been plenty of situations I look back on and wish I hadn’t been afraid to stand out. There have been so many times when maintaining or earning approval felt more important than acting on what my spirit said was right. The fruits of these moments of silence and inaction haven’t been peace. Instead, my insides have churned. I may not have been divided from others, but I was divided within myself. That’s the opposite of peace.

Despite these experiences, there have been more and more times, especially as I’ve gotten further away from my teens and twenties that I have spoken out — even if I still don’t speak about my own convictions and act on my own words as often as I would like.

When I do engage in uncomfortable conversations, they usually happen with the people I’m closest to, and I don’t think I’m alone in this experience. I open up first to the people I feel are most likely to continue the relationship with me even after I tell them something they don’t want to hear.

What happens when I venture into these conversations? Yes, my heart races, I sweat, and I blush. But how do I feel once I’ve said what I needed to say? Calm. Why? Because I’ve been honest. I haven’t suppressed what matters to me. I’ve allowed myself to experience God’s peace, which is rooted in love, truth and justice. And as I heard in the homily this weekend, God’s peace means more than “getting along.”

Does this deeper understanding of peace mean I should act with violence, or that I should go through life starting arguments? No! God desires that everything I do be rooted in love, truth, and justice. And neither adopting a confrontational tone by default, nor resorting to violence is rooted in these building blocks of peace.

Work cited

The Bible. The New American Bible Revised Edition, Kindle edition, Fairbrother, 2011.

Read Full Post »

Photo by Maxime Bouffard on Unsplash

As I begin drafting this week, it’s Thursday, July 28, and thanks to some opportunities I’ve seized outside of this blog, I’m out of time to put together the type of post I have before. Right now, God seems to be using life to teach me not to cling too tightly to my plans.

Now I’m far from opposed to making plans. I want to encourage everyone to make them. Outcomes aside, the planning process itself is a great teacher, not just about what we’re planning, but about ourselves. So even when plans don’t work out the way we hoped, they aren’t wasted. Sometimes, they do work out the way we hope they will, but the path we take to get to the intended destination isn’t the one we thought we’d follow. Along these lines, I’m not going to skip posting this week, but I am going to try out yet another new approach in what I post. I don’t think this will be the usual approach from here on out, but it may be an option I consider from time to time.

My new approach is to share the reflections that others publish on the readings from the previous weekend. First, I want to start with Dr. Susan McGurgan’s reflection about the gospel reading that inspired my post last week. The passage was Lk 10:38-42. Dr. McGurgan’s bio under Preacher includes a wealth of credentials. You can watch a video of her preaching on this passage as well as read the text of her reflection by following this link.

Second, I want to share with you a reflection from Boston College School Associate Professor of Old Testament Jamie L Waters. Here, she reflects on the Old Testament reading from July 24, Gn. 18: 20-32. I hope you can access this reflection. As a digital subscriber, I’m not limited in the number of times I’m able to follow the link. It’s my recollection that America Media allows a certain number of free views before it asks readers to sign up for a digital subscription. However, if any of you lets me know you can’t access this article, I won’t link to this source again.

Third, I want to share with you again the prayer I wrote for my June 2 post. I’m linking to it here because this past week’s gospel reading, Lk. 11:1-13, included the Lord’s Prayer. I thought about just copying and pasting the prayer here, but then I thought referring you to the original context for it would be helpful.

And finally, I’d like to share with you Brenna Davis’s reflection on the Lord’s Prayer because who needs just my take on it — especially for the second time around? Not me. I wanted to hear someone else’s perspective. As with Dr. McGurgan’s reflection, you can watch a video of Ms. Davis presenting hers under the Video link, and you can read the text of it under the Text link. Her bio is under the Preacher link on the same page as her text and video.

Works cited

Davis, Brenna. “July 24, 2022: Seventeenth Sunday in Ordinary Time,” Catholic Women Preach, FutureChurch, https://www.catholicwomenpreach.org/preaching/07242022, 24 July 2022, Accessed 28 July 2022.

McGurgan, Dr. Susan Fleming. “July 17, 2022: Sixteenth Sunday in Ordinary Time,” Catholic Women Preach, FutureChurch, https://www.catholicwomenpreach.org/preaching/07172022, 17 July 2022, Accessed 28 July 2022.

Rutledge Lisa, “Our Ascension,” Sitting with the Sacred, Oleander Isle Editing & Publishing, https://sittingwiththesacred.com/2022/06/02/our-ascension/ 2 June 2022, Accessed 28 July 2022.

Waters, Dr. Jamie L. “God, Our Father, Calls For Justice and Hospitality,” America: The Jesuit Review, America Media, https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2022/07/20/justice-hospitality-god-father-243388?utm_source=piano&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=22942&pnespid=pLtrES0WN7EY3fDMu27sCpOT4A6nVYYtfPizzeZ4thJmHv4SYX4HgDlY5gP0d4E4o34lMxHT, 20 July 2022, Accessed 28 July 2022.

Read Full Post »

Photo by Tom Swinnen on Unsplash

I’ve often read and heard that Jesus’ parables include twists, that an element of surprise is often included, and this element increases the impact of the story all the more. The parable of The Good Samaritan (Luke 10: 25-37) is no exception to this observation. If we were hearing the story in Jesus’s’ time on earth, we might have been surprised that the Samaritan is the one who stops to help the victim. It’s my understanding that Samaritans and Jews were far from close allies around the 1st century A.D.

I wonder how Jewish hearers of this story would have felt about the fact that the priest and the Levite don’t seem to notice the man lying bloody by the side of the road. Angry at the priest and the Levite? Angry at Jesus for presenting these two characters in that way. Cynically unsurprised as in “That’s just like a priest to act that way”? Or would they be unsurprised in another way because they had heard Jesus before and were used to the ways he turned their expectations upside down? As with any story, how an audience member responds to it depends not only on the culture from which he or she comes or the status he or she has in that culture, but in the unique combination of experiences that an individual brings to the hearing.

I listened to this parable on an app that invited me to put myself into the story. Before I did that, I saw a reflection on the parable whose title asked me whether I was a victim or perpetrator in the story. I was a little surprised that when I closed my eyes and played the events in my mind, I was neither one.

I was a beggar lying on the opposite side of the road from where the victim would fall. I saw myself in this position because I can’t walk or stand. My arms don’t allow for much extension or have much strength either. If I had lived in the first century and had miraculously survived to be born and then survived to my current thirty-eight years, I’d probably stay home and be cared for by my extended family, so long as I had living relatives, as I do now. But if I were the only one of my people left, I wouldn’t have much choice but to have someone place me by the side of the road to beg for food and coins, so that’s the position I felt prompted to imagine myself in as I prayed with this parable. The position allowed me to witness the scene.

I witnessed the man being beaten and then robbed, but I didn’t make a sound because I didn’t want the perpetrators to attack me. Then, as they hurried away, and the victim and I lay turned away from each other, I thought to myself, “God’s law requires that I help this man, but he can probably still move more than I can. So what can I do?”

Beg passersby to help the injured man. That’s all. To imagine myself doing it, I’ll have to imagine I’m braver, more hopeful, and more altruistic than I am. Because if the priest and the Levite ignored the injured man, why would they give any indication they heard me calling? Perhaps because I’m persistently making noise, while the injured man isn’t. Perhaps because they’ve seen me there before, and giving me a few coins time would make them feel good without costing as much as helping the injured man would. Maybe they would answer me but would say they could do nothing because they had somewhere to be and they were already late. Besides, they didn’t have any more money on them. Maybe next they would command me to hush, and I’d clutch at their robes until they shook me off until I lost my grip. I would be silent then until they were out and of earshot.

I would feel that all was lost. What was the point in nagging people? It wouldn’t change anyone’s mind or help the injured man, and it would make things worse for me.

But so what if it gave me new rips in my scraps of clothing and some new scrapes and bruises? A man’s life was at stake, and more of that life pulsed out of him with every second that went by.

But so what if it gave me new rips in my scraps of clothing and some new scrapes and bruises? A man’s life was at stake, and more of that life pulsed out of him with every second that went by. Maybe the events of this day were one of the reasons I was here. Maybe my persistence would do some good, even if it wasn’t for me or the man, and and even if I didn’t see it.

So when I saw another man approaching at a distance, I spoke for the victim again, first in a whisper and then in a shout as the stranger passed me.

He didn’t acknowledge me but stopped to wash the other man’s wounds, lifting the victim onto his own stooped shoulders and making his way back to his horse to drape the man over the animal.

Only then, caked in dust, flushed and sweating out of every pore did he trudge over to me and hold out a coin.

“No, save it for him.” I nodded toward the man lying across the horse.

He dropped the coin into the dirt and strode toward his animal.

As he rode out of sight, that was the last I saw of either man.

Would the helper have done what he did without my pleas?

Probably.

But the price of silence had been too high to find out.

What might have been didn’t matter. What mattered was the good that had been and would continue to be.

Read Full Post »

Photo by Heike Mintel on Unsplash

“Carry no money bag, no sack, no sandals; and greet no one along the way ” (Luke 10: 4). With these words, Jesus gives seventy-two disciples counterintuitive instructions for how to prepare for their mission to help spread the Gospel. After all, we normally want to prepare for a trip by packing anything we’ll need, especially if we’re getting ready for a trip important enough to be called a mission. So what was the thinking behind Jesus’s words? I won’t pretend to know for sure, but I have no doubt that following the instructions would be very helpful to the disciples’ mission in at least these ways:

  • The disciples would be reminded or would learn for the first time about the experiences of people who are totally dependent on others for their survival. Hopefully, such an experience would make any of us want to do more to help the less fortunate in the future.
  • The dependency and simplicity with which the disciples presented themselves would convey humility. This presentation might also contrast with the grandeur with which many leaders of the day may have presented themselves. This contrast may have encountered may have aided the disciples’ trustworthiness and relatability in the eyes of some of those they wanted to reach.
  • The dependency of the disciples would present an opportunity to the people whose houses they entered, the opportunity to be the means of God’s providence. It would open the disciples to trusting God, thanks to the kindness of their fellow human beings. I’d say God’s will is to work through us is to provide for each other because, as I’ve written before, God’s very nature is relationship.
  • The disciples would receive opportunities to practice brushing off rejection, not letting it distract or dishearten them. Instead of letting rejection “cling” to them, they were to practice continuing with forward progress toward building new relationships (Luke 10: 10-11). This take on Luke 10:10-11, verses that follow the ones I began with, is not original to me. Among other places, I’ve encountered this perspective in a series of reflections I subscribe to. Writing for America Media, Sarah Vincent shared a similar perspective. perspective

Into whatever house you enter, first say, “Peace to this household.” If a peaceful person lives there, your peace will rest on him; but if not, it will return to you.

Luke 10: 5-6

Many of us aren’t called to “Carry no money bag, no sack, no sandals, and greet no one along the way” (Luke 10:4-5). In fact, especially in the literal sense, many of us may be called to the opposite: to raise money or to support financially those who depend on us, to pack an extra pair shoes, and to give a stranger a simple kindness such as a smile, a “Hello” or a “How are you?” (And actually want to know the answer, whether it’s what we want to hear or not.)

Nonetheless, it’s worth considering what we can do and whatever work we’re called to to make ourselves more open to the gifts others have to offer. It’s worth considering what we can do to demonstrate trustworthiness and humility. I wrote about these considerations in How to Share the Good News: Open a Two-Way Street. It’s also worth considering the ways we’ve been dependent since before we were born and since we were small. It’s worth considering how each of us still needs each other and God whether or not we realize our need for relationship. It’s worth considering how our needs can change due to age, an accident, an illness or another life-changing event. Nothing is guaranteed but Divine Love. Jesus’ instructions to the seventy-two disciples remind us of that.

Works cited

The Bible. The New American Bible Revised Edition, Kindle edition, Fairbrother, 2011.

Vincent Sarah. “The Disciples Show Us How to Take a Leap of Faith.” America: The Jesuit Review, their July 2022, https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2022/07/03/disciples-scripture-reflection-faith-243293/. Accessed their July 2022.

Read Full Post »

No, this isn’t a post about the band.

This is a post about “The Coming of the Spirit.” That’s the title the Bible I use gives to the first story presented in Acts Chapter 2. It’s a story I’ve heard many times, and most reflections I’ve heard or read about it focus on the effect of this event on the apostles. The affect the Spirit had on the apostles didn’t grab my attention this time, though. What I zeroed in on were the sensory details used to describe the Spirit. Acts says “And suddenly there came from the sky a noise like a strong driving wind, and it filled the entire house in which they were. Then there appeared to them tongues as of fire, which parted and came to rest on each one of them” (2:2-3). The “driving wind” and the “tongues of fire” got me thinking about the many effects wind and fire have on us here on Earth and how some of those effects can remind us of what God does.

“And suddenly there came from the sky a noise like a strong driving wind, and it filled the entire house in which they were. Then there appeared to them tongues as of fire, which parted and came to rest on each one of them.”

Acts Chapter 2:2

I’ll start with wind. It can generate energy and can send some of our balloons, kites, and ships whichever way it blows. Along with water, it can reshape the natural landscapes in which we live. It can rip apart and topple structures we build, especially if we don’t or can’t use the sturdiest materials and designs. Wind outlasts all temporary construction. But it’s gentlest form is breath.

We start fires to generate warmth and coziness. They melt what we can’t bend without them. They weld things together. We will also use fire (or more commonly the heat it generates) to purify water and instruments, to protect ourselves from disease-causing microbes. It changes how even compounds and elements react. Its heat can change the nature of matter. It turns ice to water, and water to gas. It can both solidify and consume the work of human hands. Sometimes we want it to consume the work of those hands so we can get rid of what we don’t want. This article from Science says that, sometimes, fires clear away “dead litter on the forest floor.” The article continues:

[Wildfires allow] important nutrients to return to the soil, enabling a new healthy beginning for plants and animals. . . .

But fires are only good if they serve their specific purpose. If they burn too long or the ground stays dry too long, ecosystems can’t recover.

LAKSHMI SUPRIYA

The above quotation illustrates that the analogy between the Holy Spirit and wind and fire is far from perfect. I don’t believe in a Holy Fire that burns “too long,” drying out creation so that it can’t recover. I don’t believe the Holy Spirit destroys us. On the contrary, the Spirit I believe in is all about giving life, and helping us “have it more abundantly” — (John 10:10). In its ability to refresh, I would characterize the Holy Spirit as being like water as much as fire. And God created wind, fire, and water with certain characteristics and ways of interacting with each other.

I came so that they might have life and have it more abundantly.

John 10:10

It is we who put ourselves in the path of the elements because they offers many gifts that help us establish and continue our communities. But proximity to these powerful gifts is also also one of the ways we’re vulnerable. And we contribute to the danger of their power because we who sometimes overuse, misuse and abuse what is good, including natural gifts.

In doing so, we can contribute to the destruction of ourselves and each other. Or we can use the gifts of that Spirit to allow ourselves to be reshaped for the better when nature’s power and/or human choices remind us of the frailty earthly life.

Works cited

The Bible. The New American Bible Revised Edition, Kindle edition, Fairbrother, 2011.

Supriya, Lakshmi. “Ecosystems could once bounce back from wildfires. Now, they’re being wiped out for good” Science, AAAS, 19 Dec. 2017, https://www.science.org/content/article/ecosystems-could-once-bounce-back-wildfires-now-they-re-being-wiped-out-good.

Read Full Post »

Photo by Howen on Unsplash

“Do not let your hearts be troubled or afraid (John 14:28). I heard this verse again last weekend. That was before latest mass shooting. At an elementary school. Again. I can’t believe there has been more than one mass shooting at an elementary school. I can’t believe there have been so many mass shootings, period. Well, I can believe all of it, unfortunately. But I don’t want to.

Often, I struggle with what I’m going to post here, what verse I’m going to focus on, but this time, I knew immediately that I was going to focus on John 14:28. I was going to write about how it’s one of those verses that leaves me feeling like I can never measure up, one of those verses that feels inapplicable to life as I know it on many days. The verse makes me feel this way because I live with anxiety and OCD.

If I still thought I had to be untroubled to be a faithful Christian or to grow spiritually in any way, I’d give up trying, I think.

Yet I haven’t given up, thanks to the Gospels telling me about times when Jesus was troubled. There was the time he wept when it seemed he arrived too late to save his friend Lazarus from death. He wept even though he knew Abba loved him and his friends and could still be found in the midst of the suffering and loss. Obviously, I can’t know exactly what he was feeling when he wept, but I’ve often wondered if his grief rose out of the suffering that had occurred before the massive sign that God was about to offer through him. He accepted that sometimes pain couldn’t be avoided, but his acceptance didn’t mean that he didn’t dread pain at the same time.

Peace I leave with you; my peace I give to you. Not as the world gives do I give it to you.

John 14: 27

The blood we’re told he sweated in the garden of Gethsemane is evidence of another troubled time, as is the moment on the cross when, feeling abandoned, even though on some level he must know he isn’t, (otherwise he’d have no one to implore) he cries out to God. I’d say “troubled” is a drastically inadequate word to describe how he’s feeling, yet I can also imagine him experiencing a kind of peace in this moment and the others because he knows what God is asking him to do, and that’s to respond as each situation calls him to respond. This peace doesn’t come from comfort but from discerning his purpose and acting upon it in unselfish love.

I wouldn’t go so far as to say my own acceptance of anxiety and my willingness to share it with God manage it well, but anxiety feels less inescapable than it used to. Because I accept that certain situations are going to make me anxious. And I don’t have to make the physical experience of anxiety — the muscle tension, or the churning stomach, or the faster heartbeat — go away. It’s okay just to do what I can, to go through the motions that each moment calls for. It’s okay to go about life this way because all my experiences of anxiety and discomfort are temporary.

But I get the grief doesn’t feel temporary. It feels crushing, insurmountable. I’ve heard it said that grief doesn’t go away. It just changes.

So weep. Focus on one mundane task and in the next. Turn over tables if you need to. (We’re told that Jesus did at least once.) Then help clean up the mess afterwards, and don’t resort to violence. Let’s channel our tears and our anger into positive change.

Yes, Jesus prayed. He also stood up to the suffering of others by doing what he could to relieve it. Think what good we can do if we participate in that work of Love.

Work cited

The Bible. The New American Bible Revised Edition, Kindle edition, Fairbrother, 2011.

Read Full Post »

Photo by Arturo Rey on Unsplash

“As I have loved you, so you also should love one another” (John 13:34). This is the clarification Jesus offers after he gives his followers “a new commandment.” He says people will recognize his disciples if they “love one another” as he has loved them (35). In Matthew 5:44, he tells them they shouldn’t stop at loving the members of their own group. They should go so far as to “love [their] enemies” [italics mine].

He models the version of the commandment that we get in Matthew when, from the cross, he asks his heavenly father to forgive those who have tortured, tormented, and abandoned him.

In what other ways does Jesus show love in the Gospels?

He loves the total person.

He tends not only to physical and spiritual needs, but also to intellectual, mental and emotional ones as well. He knows that even though I’m categorizing these needs separately, they’re never really separate. He teaches crowds using stories they can relate to. He doesn’t forget to feed the people will come to him before he sends them home. He meets emotional needs, not only by teaching people to hope for and to work for a just society (Google the Beatitudes), but also in another way.

He erases perceived dividing lines.

Jesus calls God his father and teaches us to do the same. (Actually, I’ve read that the word he uses translates to a more familiar name, one closer to Dad than to Father.) He excludes no one, and instead makes a point of including outcasts who approach him. Scripture tells us that he shared the experiences of both the just and the unjust. He was imprisoned and sentenced to death. He associated with tax collectors and people with traditions and practices different from the ones in which he had been brought up. I’d say there wasn’t anyone he wouldn’t connect with, though not everybody wanted to befriend him.

“As I have loved you, so you also should love one another”

John 13: 34

Marginalized people are not invisible to Jesus. The Bible tells us that in his time on earth, in a very patriarchal culture, he spoke to and touched women, even women with tainted reputations, and at least one woman who had been hemorrhaging for years. It’s my understanding that a woman with such a condition was considered unclean and would have been expected to keep distant from Jesus.

The Scriptures tell us about many more times when Jesus healed people whose health conditions isolated them and obscured their dignity in the eyes of the society in which they lived. As a person with a disability and mental health conditions, I think of these healings as helping to integrate people into their communities, as helping people contribute to their communities. Though it’s absolutely okay to want healing, no one should be sent the message that they have to be healed of what makes them different before they can be whole and be equal to everyone else. Helping someone heal is by far not the only way to help a person contribute to and integrate into a community.

He asks and answers questions.

When I think of Jesus interacting with a person, I think of him asking questions to lead that person to insight. I think of his conversations with Peter and his conversation with the Samaritan woman at the well. I also think of the times he used people’s questions as teaching opportunities. Some of the people with questions were Jewish and Roman authorities, but not all of questioners are identified in the Bible as holding official leadership positions. I think of the unnamed man who asked Jesus what else he needed to do to inherit eternal life.

He took breaks.

Jesus knew he needed to let God love him so that he could love others. He knew he needed times of withdrawing from crowds and of leaning on Abba. He prayed in deserts and gardens. He slept on a fishing boat in the middle of a storm, and he prayed when his closest friends were sleeping.

Jesus’ ways of loving looked different at different times in his earthly life. The question for us is, what do the ways he loves look like at different moments in our lives? Each of us will have different answers at different times. If two of us were to compare our answers, we would likely find similarities without having exactly the same answers.

Work cited

The Bible. The New American Bible Revised Edition, Kindle edition, Fairbrother, 2011.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts